首页 Home 》 商业Business
节能减排岂能损害公众利益
Energy saving cannot harm the interests of people
发布于2011-10-21 19:11 | 次阅读
Released on 2011-10-21 19:11 | readings
  • 中英文对照
  • 中文
  • English

在现代耗能巨大，资源加速枯竭的社会之中，节能减排本来是一项利国利民的事业。据《中国经济新闻》2007年第35期报道，是年8月26日全国人大常委会审议了《循环经济法》修订草案，力争以立法的形式在中国经济发展的过程之中实现以“减量化、再利用、资源化”为目标的节能型的循环经济，但是这项事业却在执行的过程之中开始变味，损害了老百姓的利益，甚至成为了一种政绩工程的工具，这种现象很值得人深思。

在河南林州，到本月11日的时候，河南林州市已停止供暖5天了。这段时期属于该市的全年最冷时期，气象预报显示，11日林州最低气温为-10℃。但是，另一方面，林州市长热线却回复记者说：林州今冬将为完成节能减排任务停止供暖。1月8日开始，热力公司已开始全额退还市民的供暖费。一个地处北方的内陆城市在全年最寒冷的时期，最重要的事情就是取暖，但是政府却在这个时候突然间为了“节能减排”，停止供暖，不仅仅给很多单位和家庭的生活和工作带来了诸多不便，而且实际上也不会起到真正地节能减排的效用。
 
很多人在没了集中供暖的情况下，必然会寻找其他办法来取暖，收入低的人会重新捡起原来的煤炉子或购买电暖器；收入较高的人必然就会装上空调；一些部门和单位就会烧起大锅炉。这样的结果就是集中式的供热模式变成了分散的，粗放的取暖模式，必然会造成更多的污染和能源浪费，而且还会带来很多安全方面的隐患。此外，经济上的相关支出也会增加，因为再则停止了供暖，原来无须购置的取暖设施要添置，并且自行取暖的费用比起集中取暖成本要高，要增加不少的费用，所以停止供暖从经济上算也给老百姓带来很大的负担。
 
诚然，表面上看来，供暖停止以后，用电指标的确下降了，规定的“节能减排”指标也能完成或者超额，由此政绩显赫。但是实际上，因为由此导致的分散供暖的出现，此“能”不但没有降低反而上升，“排”没有节省反而加大，此种“节能减排”只是“掩耳盗铃”。

“节能减排”是项硬指标，不能马虎，作为其中之一的用电进行控制很有必要，但控制用电要视情而定，不能拿与保障公众生活的取暖开刀，应该是对一些污染大，消耗大，确实需要关停并转的企业进行限制，更应该加强平常节电的教育和管理，做到不浪费，厉行节约。而一味的追求指标的“节能减排”适得其反。

有关部门多次强调，“不能简单拉闸限电，更不能停限居民生活用电、采暖和公共设施用电”，可是一些地方却置若罔闻。停止供暖的背后，导致公众负担加重，能耗不减反升，实在是得不偿失，此举是典型的牺牲公众的利益，追求表面的政绩行为，比起现实中的污染超能更为严重，应严厉追究。

In the modern society with huge energy-consuming and accelerating depletion of the resources, energy saving would have benefits to our country. According to China Economic News reported in 2007, No. 35,on August 26 that year the NPC Standing Committee examined the revised draft of "Circular Economy", striving to achieve the goal of energy-efficient recycling economy with the method of "reducing quantity, reusing and recycling " through legislation in the China's economic development process , but this crusade began to diverge from its basic idea in the process of implementation, damaging the interests of the people, and even becoming a kind of “performance engineering” tools. This phenomenon is worth thinking about.

In Henan, on the 11th day of this month, the heating in Linzhou City has been stopped for 5 days, the coldest period of the city during the year. Weather forecasts show that the minimum temperature of this city is -10  ℃. But on the other side, the hot line response of mayor told reporters that: the city stopped the heating in order to complete energy saving tasks of this winter. Beginning on January 8, the heating company has begun to refund the heating costs to the people in the city. In the coldest period in one year of an inland city located in the north in China , the most important thing is heating, but the government has suddenly begun to stop heating in order to complete "energy saving" task at this time, bringing a lot of inconvenience to the life and work of many companies and families, without achieving the goal of “energy saving”.
 
A lot of people in the situation is bound to find other ways to warm: low-income people will re-pick up the coal stove child or to buy the original coal stove heater; People with higher incomes would definitely use air conditioning; some departments and units will burn big boiler. The result is that the centralized heating mode was transformed into a decentralized, extensive heating mode, which will cause more pollution and energy waste, also lead to a lot of security risks. In addition, the economic-related expenses will increase, because once the heating was stopped, people need to purchase heating facilities they originally need not to purchase, and self-heating costs will be higher than the centralized heating costs, so stopping the heating would bring great burden to the people.
 
Apparently, after the cessation of heating, electricity index fell indeed, and the "energy conservation" targets can be completed, which would be outstanding political performance. But in fact, because of the extensive heating resulting from this situation, not only that the energy cannot be reduced, but also the pollution will be increased. This "energy conservation" is "deceiving."
 
The electricity control is necessary under the “Energy saving” police, but it cannot be completed with the sacrifice of people’s life, but should be achieved through the method of limiting the electricity of big enterprise with huge pollution and energy cost. 

Authorities repeatedly stressed that "we cannot simply cut power and stop the electricity, heating and electricity in public facilities of ordinary people," but some places have turned a deaf ear. Stopping the heating will strengthen the public burden, rise the energy cost, which is a typical example of pursuing the political show，at the expense of the public interest.

在现代耗能巨大，资源加速枯竭的社会之中，节能减排本来是一项利国利民的事业。据《中国经济新闻》2007年第35期报道，是年8月26日全国人大常委会审议了《循环经济法》修订草案，力争以立法的形式在中国经济发展的过程之中实现以“减量化、再利用、资源化”为目标的节能型的循环经济，但是这项事业却在执行的过程之中开始变味，损害了老百姓的利益，甚至成为了一种政绩工程的工具，这种现象很值得人深思。

在河南林州，到本月11日的时候，河南林州市已停止供暖5天了。这段时期属于该市的全年最冷时期，气象预报显示，11日林州最低气温为-10℃。但是，另一方面，林州市长热线却回复记者说：林州今冬将为完成节能减排任务停止供暖。1月8日开始，热力公司已开始全额退还市民的供暖费。一个地处北方的内陆城市在全年最寒冷的时期，最重要的事情就是取暖，但是政府却在这个时候突然间为了“节能减排”，停止供暖，不仅仅给很多单位和家庭的生活和工作带来了诸多不便，而且实际上也不会起到真正地节能减排的效用。
 
很多人在没了集中供暖的情况下，必然会寻找其他办法来取暖，收入低的人会重新捡起原来的煤炉子或购买电暖器；收入较高的人必然就会装上空调；一些部门和单位就会烧起大锅炉。这样的结果就是集中式的供热模式变成了分散的，粗放的取暖模式，必然会造成更多的污染和能源浪费，而且还会带来很多安全方面的隐患。此外，经济上的相关支出也会增加，因为再则停止了供暖，原来无须购置的取暖设施要添置，并且自行取暖的费用比起集中取暖成本要高，要增加不少的费用，所以停止供暖从经济上算也给老百姓带来很大的负担。
 
诚然，表面上看来，供暖停止以后，用电指标的确下降了，规定的“节能减排”指标也能完成或者超额，由此政绩显赫。但是实际上，因为由此导致的分散供暖的出现，此“能”不但没有降低反而上升，“排”没有节省反而加大，此种“节能减排”只是“掩耳盗铃”。

“节能减排”是项硬指标，不能马虎，作为其中之一的用电进行控制很有必要，但控制用电要视情而定，不能拿与保障公众生活的取暖开刀，应该是对一些污染大，消耗大，确实需要关停并转的企业进行限制，更应该加强平常节电的教育和管理，做到不浪费，厉行节约。而一味的追求指标的“节能减排”适得其反。

有关部门多次强调，“不能简单拉闸限电，更不能停限居民生活用电、采暖和公共设施用电”，可是一些地方却置若罔闻。停止供暖的背后，导致公众负担加重，能耗不减反升，实在是得不偿失，此举是典型的牺牲公众的利益，追求表面的政绩行为，比起现实中的污染超能更为严重，应严厉追究。

In the modern society with huge energy-consuming and accelerating depletion of the resources, energy saving would have benefits to our country. According to China Economic News reported in 2007, No. 35,on August 26 that year the NPC Standing Committee examined the revised draft of "Circular Economy", striving to achieve the goal of energy-efficient recycling economy with the method of "reducing quantity, reusing and recycling " through legislation in the China's economic development process , but this crusade began to diverge from its basic idea in the process of implementation, damaging the interests of the people, and even becoming a kind of “performance engineering” tools. This phenomenon is worth thinking about.

In Henan, on the 11th day of this month, the heating in Linzhou City has been stopped for 5 days, the coldest period of the city during the year. Weather forecasts show that the minimum temperature of this city is -10  ℃. But on the other side, the hot line response of mayor told reporters that: the city stopped the heating in order to complete energy saving tasks of this winter. Beginning on January 8, the heating company has begun to refund the heating costs to the people in the city. In the coldest period in one year of an inland city located in the north in China , the most important thing is heating, but the government has suddenly begun to stop heating in order to complete "energy saving" task at this time, bringing a lot of inconvenience to the life and work of many companies and families, without achieving the goal of “energy saving”.
 
A lot of people in the situation is bound to find other ways to warm: low-income people will re-pick up the coal stove child or to buy the original coal stove heater; People with higher incomes would definitely use air conditioning; some departments and units will burn big boiler. The result is that the centralized heating mode was transformed into a decentralized, extensive heating mode, which will cause more pollution and energy waste, also lead to a lot of security risks. In addition, the economic-related expenses will increase, because once the heating was stopped, people need to purchase heating facilities they originally need not to purchase, and self-heating costs will be higher than the centralized heating costs, so stopping the heating would bring great burden to the people.
 
Apparently, after the cessation of heating, electricity index fell indeed, and the "energy conservation" targets can be completed, which would be outstanding political performance. But in fact, because of the extensive heating resulting from this situation, not only that the energy cannot be reduced, but also the pollution will be increased. This "energy conservation" is "deceiving."
 
The electricity control is necessary under the “Energy saving” police, but it cannot be completed with the sacrifice of people’s life, but should be achieved through the method of limiting the electricity of big enterprise with huge pollution and energy cost. 

Authorities repeatedly stressed that "we cannot simply cut power and stop the electricity, heating and electricity in public facilities of ordinary people," but some places have turned a deaf ear. Stopping the heating will strengthen the public burden, rise the energy cost, which is a typical example of pursuing the political show，at the expense of the public interest.

上一篇 下一篇
对本篇文章的质量打分

当前平均分：打分后显示！

-5-4-3-2-1012345
对本文发表评论
点击刷新点击刷新
评论仅代表网友本人的观点，不代表中国经济新闻立场。